NASA's Robotic Lunar Lander - Smarter Every Day 252

7. mars. 2021
1 035 983 Ganger

Check out KiwiCo.com/Smarter50 for 50% off your first month of any crate!
Click here if you're interested in subscribing: bit.ly/Subscribe2SED
⇊ Click below for more links! ⇊
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
GET SMARTER SECTION
Human Landing System Program:
www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/nac-charts-hls-overview-may-2020-heoc.pdf
Mighty Eagle
noworld.info/video/video/05ymft2rxqXftKM.html
www.jhuapl.edu/Content/techdigest/pdf/V32-N03/32-03-McGee.pdf
Morpheus
morpheuslander.jsc.nasa.gov/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tweet Ideas to me at:
twitter.com/smartereveryday
Smarter Every Day on Facebook
facebook.com/SmarterEveryDay
Smarter Every Day on Patreon
www.patreon.com/smartereveryday
Smarter Every Day On Instagram
instagram.com/smartereveryday
Smarter Every Day SubReddit
www.reddit.com/r/smartereveryday
Ambiance, audio and musicy things by: Gordon McGladdery
www.ashellinthepit.com/
ashellinthepit.bandcamp.com/
If you feel like this video was worth your time and added value to your life, please SHARE THE VIDEO!
If you REALLY liked it, feel free to pitch a few dollars Smarter Every Day by becoming a Patron.
www.patreon.com/smartereveryday
Warm Regards,
Destin

Kommentarer
  • A huge thank you to everyone who supports on Patreon at www.patreon.com/smartereveryday!

    SmarterEveryDaySmarterEveryDayMåned siden
    • @Akash Das oo

      Man4man Jr.Man4man Jr.16 dager siden
    • Have the software support the human, but not replace totally. If its a drone, thats a different matter. But if there's a meatbag in the flightseat, you need to have human over-ride.

      MonkeyspankOMonkeyspankO21 dag siden
    • Please do rail guns... I know the military has one in development lol

      the bystanderdthe bystanderd23 dager siden
    • S T O P. R A P E I N G. B A B I E S Your right thumbnail algorithm/ / your right / see the started trying to give me power so that they could take it back / or stop it /specifily , my Ryu(/re/-ehw/)// because / let be honest / a guy who can shoot fireballs out of his hand / at will / is scary / / and mine bends thick steell//

      digital subliminal messagesdigital subliminal messages25 dager siden
    • Your one of my favorite NOworldrs. Your so fun to watch and I appreciate what you make, and I appreciate what you do.

      RadicalSunnyBunnyRadicalSunnyBunnyMåned siden
  • 😁👍

    Mohammad ReyazMohammad Reyaz7 timer siden
  • Fun fact: the lunar lander WAS robotic. Excepting the Apollo 11 mission, where the ascent radar wasn’t switched off (and overloading the computer), the navigation computer was capable of completing the landing autonomously. The only intervention required by the pilot was in selecting the landing site.

    ShawnShawn22 timer siden
  • About options for controlling the lander, I'm hoping that in the near future, with the surge in brain-computer interface technology (Thanks to Neuralink mostly!) it'll be feasible to control a lander (or many other semi-autonomous systems for that matter) merely by brain signals.

    Moein TaherkhaniMoein TaherkhaniDag siden
  • 16:44 that felt like a music festival openings sequence

    Guido HaverkortGuido Haverkort2 dager siden
  • Me a ksp intellectual: *WASD*

    TeddyTeddy2 dager siden
  • Hey Dustin, is it possible to take say something similar to bungee cord attached to the top of the lander and apply just enough tension to simulate the different gravity of different planet's? just for the practice landing/flying

    William AndrewsWilliam Andrews3 dager siden
  • Hydrogen peroxide used for the might eagle was also used as a fuel for the Me 163 and the German type XVII submarine

    Andy CAndy C3 dager siden
  • Obviously these are some very smart people working on this project. But the number of checks and the incredible focus on safety above all else is why Elon Musk and SpaceX are eating NASA's lunch. They've just bought a big enough piece of property and are willing to crash some, or even a lot, of prototypes in order to move fast. Witness Starship.

    Michael ZdanisMichael Zdanis3 dager siden
  • The mere argentina cytochemically hover because belgian customarily shade plus a vivacious den. tidy, whole pocket

    calvin zanecalvin zane5 dager siden
  • The longing queen actually burn because mass ordinarily slow beside a evanescent cabinet. tacit, windy half-brother

    andy mcphersonandy mcpherson5 dager siden
  • MORE MORE MORE MORE MORE>>More vids PLEASE...

    I SEE YouI SEE You5 dager siden
  • are u trying to convince me that Neil Armstrong managed to control MANUALLY his landing on the moon by using 60s technology?

    Mohamed RezineMohamed Rezine5 dager siden
  • Thanks, Destin, for all the great videos you provide. I'm intrigued every time I tune in! Keep up the fantastic work!

    Erwin BordalloErwin Bordallo5 dager siden
  • Flute anything with enough water and it would be safe....eventually

    WatchmakuhWatchmakuh6 dager siden
  • use the best took for the job... humans hand flying a vehicle is probably a long way down the list of being the best tool for that job.

    TheNiteinjailTheNiteinjail6 dager siden
  • I think the EGC thruster concept is really cool, but I don't understand how it would work at different attitudes? Wouldn't it's thrust vector introduce sideways drift as the vehicle tilts? Like, if you subtract the EGCT force vector from the gravity vector you should get a "simulated gravity vector". But since the EGCT vector rotates with the vehicle, the simulated gravity vector would appear to not point straight down all the time. Is that dealt with in software? If so, why use a EGCT at all and not just do the entire gravity spoofing in software?

    QuatrixQuatrix6 dager siden
  • when software creates a catastrophic mistake it's because of a bug when human creates a catastrophic mistake it says "trust me i know what i'm doing"

    tsartomatotsartomato7 dager siden
  • How is this new? The first lunar landing and soft landing where both by the Soviet Union back in the day.

    S GamesS Games7 dager siden
  • Why not do a physical lander robot with a remote simulated cockpit so the LLTV dangers are eliminated?

    Corey ACorey A8 dager siden
  • Please make a video about your family

    Martin Link-ColeMartin Link-Cole8 dager siden
  • The legend says in 20 years NASA is still trying to return to the Moon.

    Gustav CalderGustav Calder8 dager siden
  • So that's why they named Cooper like that in Interstellar, and that's also why the climax of most of it is Humans(Copper) overriding computers(TARS) for the toughest parts and getting computers to act as an appendix of the genius of humans. That was deep. Copper Harper Test. Amazing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Israel MartinezIsrael Martinez8 dager siden
  • @15:09 the old man with the bag of chips...LOL...

    Remco BooyRemco Booy9 dager siden
  • Love the use of female pronouns! Creating an environment to encourage more women to join the domain. You're awesome

    Edward WuEdward Wu9 dager siden
  • The unaccountable schedule putatively stop because growth reassembly play during a irritating battle. first, endurable wholesaler

    Jack RothrockJack Rothrock9 dager siden
  • It will melt your face

    David NDavid N9 dager siden
  • 16:45 That thing has a good beat, kind of like a steam engine... which it sort of is :-)

    zapfanzapfanzapfanzapfan10 dager siden
  • "Just the nitrogen pushing on the peroxide. Real simple".....................

    Keatrith AmakiirKeatrith Amakiir10 dager siden
  • People wasting hundreds of thousands of dollars on something that could be simulated by a computer program, why don’t design a lunar lander simulator

    KornpatchKornpatch10 dager siden
    • are you an idiot almost sim is completely correct

      reinis z9reinis z97 dager siden
  • 1960's: Decide to go to the moon and do it in less than 10 years. 2010's-2020's: Decide to return to the moon, and spend 10 years trying to understand how a lander works. And go woke referring to prospective lander pilot as "she." What would Elon Musk say. Speed up, you move too slow, you gotta make it to the show. NASA has become a bloated unaccountable govt bureaucracy. The shot of the fat guy sitting watching while eating junk is emblematic of what NASA has become. When NASA was put in charge of studying surface of Earth, we could see the problem, but nobody objected. What does studying life on Earth have to do with space? Typical fed govt mission creep. Dumber every day? Might make for an interesting episode to address those issues. Yes, I'm trolling you, but for a good reason. Think and share.

    Blake RBlake R10 dager siden
  • Rule no1: never mumble when saying "the mighty eagle" or people might understand "the mighty evil" 😂

    ColdSphinXColdSphinX10 dager siden
  • Para to sa mga putang inang amerikano PAPATAY AKO NG PUTANG INANG ANIMAL NA AMERIKANONG CEO SA HARAP NG MGA INUTIL AT MANGMANG NA FBI CIA MGA PUTANG INA NYO I DO NOT FEAR ANYONE ESPECIALLY AMERICANS

    Mark Angel ArcangelMark Angel Arcangel10 dager siden
  • Just use software exclusively, that way it's easier to fake.

    Kenton NigrelliKenton Nigrelli10 dager siden
  • 1:10 Not a chance, the computer would do the landing

    jamcdonald120jamcdonald12010 dager siden
  • Experience of automation in aviation up to the day says that autopilot is more precise than humans, and (most importantly) is more reliable. The only reason a human is needed in the cockpit is when things don't go as planned - the automatics is helpful only in "standard" situations which it has an algorithm programmed for. So the weakness of automation is only in the lack of versatility. But for a very specific mission like a lunar landing, which doesn't have as great variety of scenarios as daily aviation, a good coverage can be achieved easily. Therefore having computers at control at all times *is* the way forward. Training a human to do this job ("just in case") would be a waste of resource. Human skills would be more valuable making high-level decisions (where to land) while leaving the low-level job (how to land) to the machine. So I'd say don't even bother training humans to fly the lander.

    John MartinJohn Martin11 dager siden
  • You are so good at asking the right questions. I love you're videos

    ValkyrieValkyrie11 dager siden
  • "It's basically steam" Steampunk gang developing a lunar lander, I'm so proud :')

    João Vitor M. RomaJoão Vitor M. Roma11 dager siden
  • Destin literally doesn't age! Insane!

    Sam MiddletonSam Middleton11 dager siden
  • It' Ironic that the video said day 252 but the first day is more then 5 years

    Crazy manCrazy man11 dager siden
  • Dude whats the secret?? You dont get old 😂😂

    HTM MotoringHTM Motoring12 dager siden
  • Hey Dustin a request can you please put a lite tune or background song it feels kind a boring without the background song or tunes ?

    Akshat SharmaAkshat Sharma12 dager siden
  • it's very safe, not toxic at all... 2 minutes later.. "yeah, it will melt your face off" lol - i do it i get it, but just funny..

    FabFab12 dager siden
  • is the earth gravity cancelling throttle gimballed to compensate for the rotation of the craft to simulate gravity downwards irrespective of the vehicles rotation?

    Niel VenterNiel Venter12 dager siden
  • Like self driving cars, an automated lunar landsr might be favorable but keep the human in the loop!

    Anakin SkyobiliviatorAnakin Skyobiliviator12 dager siden
  • I'm leaving a comment to interact and show my support of the channel.

    Michael MacGyverMichael MacGyver12 dager siden
  • That's an inventive use of a couple of TekScope carts at the end - I have one in my office and no, there's not a scope on it anymore ;)

    Gregory HavengaGregory Havenga12 dager siden
  • I get your hesitance about stability augmentation, but these systems are highly reliable on aircraft, to the point no pilot wants to turn them off... At least outside of a controlled test. The point is if we want the ability to turn the SAS off, we’re saying we don’t have confidence in it and we need to continue testing and developing the system until we do. At least that’s the perspective of this flight test engineer.

    Kirk HarwoodKirk Harwood13 dager siden
  • He looks better with beard

    BaHuBaHu13 dager siden
  • Well... NASA has contracted this out (The lander), so why are they even bothering to use NASA personnel to do these test, when the contractors will have to do this testing on unique to them hardware? Self guidance is going to need a real landing site simulator that is comparable to the Nevada Lunar Test Site. Placing rocks on the ply-wood sheets aint going to cut it. Is there even hardware to test at this time by anyone yet? the first landing is supposed to be in 2024. They better get cracking.

    hawkdslhawkdsl13 dager siden
  • These landers work so different than quadcopters yet the tests are similiar to how our college multirotor team took each step with our code. It is awesome to see that!

    Logan ThomureLogan Thomure14 dager siden
  • any other climbers watching this? i noticed his t-shirt straight away😂

    jacob sackjacob sack14 dager siden
  • when those thrusters start testing = Oh DANG... Drum Line is about to get SERIOUS!!!

    Jim PayneJim Payne14 dager siden
  • Destin, I'm going to offer you a third option. Why not use the miniatures and test data to develop a simulator? A full motion simulator would allow for a wider variety of simulations, moon, Mars, etc. that would allows us to many more hours of simulation training for astronauts.

    Jeremiah MauricioJeremiah Mauricio14 dager siden
  • I agree, in Elite Dangerous you have advanced docking computers and super cruise computers that can fly for you, but you'll still need to battle different gravity on different planets and your ship responds far differently in these environments, if you aren't prepared your ship will go smashing into the surface of the planet. It all changes like you said. A highly trained piolet will need to be on that lander to take over if the software fails. Also the way the lander tests its thrusters sounds like its about to drop a sick beat lmao

    Moto NuggetMoto Nugget14 dager siden
  • 16:55 ME's got rhythm!

    Chris From SouthAusChris From SouthAus14 dager siden
  • nerds

    Md AziukMd Aziuk14 dager siden
  • Destin : yeah, you are smart, you know whats goong to happen Me : looking through comment to become smart Ps. Im not smart

    Ivan SitorusIvan Sitorus14 dager siden
  • Prove the earth isn't flat. Finally put these flat earthers to rest!

    NismosakiNismosaki14 dager siden
  • The fresh regret invariably concern because double immunohistologically place times a guttural H habitual arithmetic. silent, raspy twist

    Rishaan AgRishaan Ag14 dager siden
  • The draconian leo arthroscopically meddle because crocus dolly decide failing a plucky arithmetic. historical, dramatic cross

    Paten NoraPaten Nora14 dager siden
  • This is NASA now? Where are the suites and ties and horn rimmed glasses and cigarettes and black coffee? These guys look like the work for twitter.

    R SnowR Snow14 dager siden
  • Where do you find that book? I want to read all about Hydrogen Peroxide into Rocket Fuel.

    Frank BoschmaFrank Boschma15 dager siden
  • You need to go to Biosphere 2. And learn about lunar greenhouses. It's in Arizona.

    A MA M15 dager siden
  • the space travel hoax continues.. even though NASA admits they cannot fly past low earth orbit. Buzz Aldrin admitted to an 8 year old girl, they never landed on the moon... beat that.

    Chris RoubisChris Roubis15 dager siden
    • no, they never admitted that. They admitted they have to test their technology past the radiation belts to verify they are well protected before sending men and women up again. Also that argument of "They cant get past LEO" kinda debunks space deniers claims that the ISS cant exist, considering its in LEO. 2 FOR 1 debunk on space deniers 😁

      HeatsOkayHeatsOkay10 dager siden
  • The unwritten novel isely ignore because parcel histomorphometrically park versus a easy priest. kindhearted, thinkable hourglass

    Diocles RodriguezDiocles Rodriguez15 dager siden
  • I think the that the Lunar Lander would be really good the way you explained it. so It should have a sort of Autopilot like in most of the airplanes we fly today where you also can Autoland with them but you also have to have a minimum where you have to disengage the autopilot and hand fly the thing whenever you feel uncomfortable with the Autopilot or in case of an emergency . And this was a great video for someone studying mechanical engineering, aviation aviation enthusiast and space lover. Than you!

    ayman naesayman naes15 dager siden
  • that thing produces something like 100kg of hot unreacted oxygen. isn't that, like, crazy dangerous?

    Alexander SannikovAlexander Sannikov15 dager siden
  • The special cloudy postsurgically interfere because musician ultrasonically knock given a kindhearted rail. chemical, bizarre rugby

    Sawcon DeeznutsSawcon Deeznuts15 dager siden
  • I LOVE IT. NASA will love it too. Retired AeroSpace Designer, GEAEGB.

    Robert K BrooksRobert K Brooks16 dager siden
  • The only place human-controlled systems should be given is in the failure mode where hardware can no longer operate normally and pilots should be trained as such. Humans are too big of a liability, and safety is number one. You knew the job was dangerous when you took it, but let's take risk out with some triple or quadruple modular redundancy, eh?

    Pokemonmaster529Pokemonmaster52916 dager siden
  • 12:30 So, if we wanted to practice landing on other planets, just adjust that valve?

    Graeme ForbesGraeme Forbes16 dager siden
  • The Closed Captions need some work...

    EVA_Unit_4AEVA_Unit_4A16 dager siden
  • Hi Destin! I have a question about the EGC thruster... how can it cancel part of the earth's gravity when the lander is going sideways? Does it have thrust vectoring to keep the force in the oposite direction of the gravity pull?

    Victor Wilson RizzoVictor Wilson Rizzo16 dager siden
  • Hydrogen peroxide in the environment means a lot of dumb blonde animals.

    Michael MooreMichael Moore16 dager siden
  • Does the egc pivot? I couldn't tell

    bkzwolfbkzwolf16 dager siden
  • I tried Kiwico because of one of your videos. Unfortunately, Kiwico does not deliver to Norway. I subscibed to their service and over time payed for two crates, they said they sendt 5 or 6 crates over the months I was emailing them back and forth to get it sorted out. But Kiwico kept sending new crates seemingly without checking what had actually happened to all the previous crates... I never received any crates, I stopped emailing them because they would just say that they've sendt another crate for free, which never arrives...

    Magnus / spetzMagnus / spetz16 dager siden
  • the question is economical is it realistic training a pilot to land will it be cheaper to lose the pilot and redo this than paying for years of training, in my personal testing its always better to lose a kerbal and just redo the mission

    Max andersMax anders16 dager siden
  • so u wanna work at nasa? show me your best imitaion of a dinosaur

    Max andersMax anders16 dager siden
  • Mighty Eagle Program?? Nah ... it's called Kerbal Space Program and probably all of us could land a lunar vehicle by now. ^^

    UnotchUnotch16 dager siden
  • Hey Destin, I know I'm a bit Late for Other Video Topics, but I am curious about Kalman-Filter. Or more precisely how do you measure the position of your Spacecraft if you can't trust your measurement. And how Nasa is solving that Problem with new technology. Could be interesting, I certainly would love to hear about it.

    Ferdinand OlanFerdinand Olan17 dager siden
  • Nice👏

    Sahveer . comSahveer . com17 dager siden
  • If the new moon program is anything like the other post shuttle human flight programs, I suspect that if a human has to manually fly it's a bad day. Regardless, they should train to land on the moon however they are going to land on the moon. Back in Apollo that was completely manually. In Artemis, it looks like it's going to be nearly entirely automated.

    SuperStewieSuperStewie17 dager siden
  • I don’t know how often you read these comments , but I watch your videos with my boys every time you publish a new one. Out of all the things God has blessed you with, the thing that always impresses me most is your humility. You are very intelligent, you care about your family, and you have an unceasing desire to learn which is wonderful, but your understanding of who you are in the grand scheme of creation is a rare thing to see. Keep it up :)

    West Georgia CornholeWest Georgia Cornhole17 dager siden
  • Why isn't both software and human landing testing done on a simulator? Is it too difficult to modify a flight sim to do this?

    Nathaniel ArbizuNathaniel Arbizu18 dager siden
  • The only problem with the argument that the pilot should fly the lander is that it is far too complex and counter intuitive with no room for error. Even Armstrong didn’t fly it, he gave the lander software the target destination and the software did the flying.

    GeneratorGenerator18 dager siden
  • It’s basically steamed hams

    GrafRucolaGrafRucola18 dager siden
  • QUESTION FOR DESTIN: When you snuff out a candle by putting the lid on it, why does the flame leave the wick and ascend upwards as it goes out?

    Stephen PauleyStephen Pauley18 dager siden
  • 16:45 Looks like me, 2hours of preparation, 2seconds of pleasure 🤦‍♂️

    LeoLeo18 dager siden
  • im still waiting for the bass drop.

    Blaze2GoBlaze2Go18 dager siden
  • Dual landing systems are a must. Go in on auto, but be ready to take over.

    Alan Vermillion SrAlan Vermillion Sr19 dager siden
  • this will be my second time asking "this might be a weird question but do subs have procedures for bed bug infestations" and if so what are they?

    Jacob EllingerJacob Ellinger19 dager siden
  • Can you do a video on sonoluminessence with the high speed.

    Jacob BlatnicaJacob Blatnica19 dager siden
  • Is this guy Young Sheldon the 10 year old genius ( It's a series) XD ? Lol, This is so cool

    Miss DeeMiss Dee19 dager siden
  • Superb

    SRI KANAKA DURGA ARTS & CREATIONSSRI KANAKA DURGA ARTS & CREATIONS19 dager siden
  • smarter every two weeks

    Hansa PVPHansa PVP19 dager siden
  • I'm glad you referred to the potential landing pilot as "she" it did not go unnoticed

    Ben EellsBen Eells20 dager siden
  • Hey Destin! I've got an auditory phenomenon of a science mystery my whole family is curious about solving. Any chance you might be interested?

    - RedShift -- RedShift -20 dager siden
  • Have you ever tried looxid link or nextmind? I saw some vids on youtube but since i k you better than these other youtubers i wonder if you can check them out to see if those are for real :). Tyvm

    Sneaky JaySneaky Jay20 dager siden
  • very cool ..

    krazziee2000krazziee200020 dager siden
NOworld