HOW TO LAND ON THE MOON - Smarter Every Day 250

30. jan.. 2021
1 269 783 Ganger

Get 1st Audiobook + full access to the Plus Catalog for free when you try Audible for 30 days or TXT smarter to 500500
Click here if you're interested in subscribing:
⇊ Click below for more links! ⇊
A very special thank you to Wayne Ottinger
Check out the AMAZING website by Ben Feist that synchronizes all Apollo data:
I had to find a lot of archival footage to make this video. Thanks to Devin for helping me find the original Apollo LLTV footage from Ellington.
A special thank you to for providing the footage and audio of the Neil Armstrong Interview after flying the LLTV.
Tweet Ideas to me at:
Smarter Every Day on Facebook
Smarter Every Day on Patreon
Smarter Every Day On Instagram
Smarter Every Day SubReddit
Ambiance, audio and musicy things by: Gordon McGladdery
If you feel like this video was worth your time and added value to your life, please SHARE THE VIDEO!
If you REALLY liked it, feel free to pitch a few dollars Smarter Every Day by becoming a Patron.
Warm Regards,

  • We're going back to the moon, and we're going to need to train Astronauts how to land. This video is the result of trying to understand that control problem better. in the next video of this series, I'll show you footage from an actual NASA Lunar Lander software test I participated in many years ago. Also, I'd like to say express grateful I am to everyone who supports Smarter Every Day on Patreon at . If you've never considered being a Patreon of Smarter Every Day, then feel free to click the link if you'd like to see what it's all about. If not, then no big deal! I'm grateful that you're here. Warm Regards, Destin

    SmarterEveryDaySmarterEveryDay28 dager siden
    • Yyhqara6 you

      adam philpadam philp14 timer siden
    • @MaGaO true, but the software to land reliably is fairly new and getting better all the time. Most of the failed Mars landings happened without the benefit of the sensors and algorithms available now. It's still best to train the pilots of course.

      AlmaadinAlmaadin2 dager siden
    • @Almaadin Many Mars probes have crashed. If humans are aboard, it makes sense to train them just in case.

      MaGaOMaGaO2 dager siden
    • @Almaadin that was done on gullible lol. Mars supposedly is 1% density of earth atmosphere. which means no air. an you need air to slow parachute and need air for lift when they eventually fly helicopter drone. so the impossible without air debunks your Mars landing 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣😭😭😭😭😂🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😭😭

      hernan jimenezhernan jimenez2 dager siden
    • I disagree with your thesis statement. After watching perseverance land itself, I think we could definitely automate landing on the moon. It is probably still a good idea to train astronauts to land on the moon but I don't think we HAVE to.

      AlmaadinAlmaadin2 dager siden
  • 4:06 the the angle dynamically shook with his hands, now that's detail.

    TheEmeraldSwordTheEmeraldSwordTime siden
  • This was an amazing video. Thank you. Understanding the why truly is as pertinent as the how. If you understand the why, then engineers can use updated techniques if possible instead of just repeating work arounds.

    Kerrie ArkwellKerrie Arkwell3 timer siden
  • The communists now in charge want nothing to do with moon landings anyway, so...

    Dan BertucciDan Bertucci3 timer siden
  • I don't even drink and I want the lunar shot glass

    SlayerofFictionSlayerofFiction4 timer siden
  • I really do not see the point. The next one will be landed by ai.

    Gert KrugerGert Kruger5 timer siden
  • amogus

    KatzRoolKatzRool9 timer siden
  • 4:30 "and if there were no drag.." If there were no drag then there would be no thrust/movement. Just like if there were no weight/gravity there would be no lift.

    DrCash7DrCash712 timer siden
  • Fek

    DrCash7DrCash712 timer siden
  • Would be quite impossible to control Starship HLS by hand. Will be autonomous.

    EphraimEphraim13 timer siden
  • NASA scientists shoulda just played Kerbal Space Program. I was landing on the Mun as a teenager.

    DhoulmegusDhoulmegus13 timer siden
  • Well done video, learned a lot, (like there are still people that think we didn’t go to the moon, and the earth is flat. I’m sure there are still those that think Hitler didn’t murder millions of people in death camps...) My question is, why go back to the moon? What’s there that we can benefit people? It will cost billions of dollars, tax dollars, just to say we can it? It’s a moon with ... not much on it. The distances to leave our solar system to anyway else are just too far away. Sorry, this isn’t Star Trek, or some other fantasy TV show... .

    strshooterstrshooter15 timer siden
  • Nah uh, they didn't "make sure velocity is zero when touching the surface". They had probes sticking out of lander which, when the probes touched the surface, automatically shut the engine down (while still some meters above the ground), so the lander gently dropped to the ground.

    maksphoto78maksphoto7815 timer siden
  • 1:58 among us 🤑🤑🤙👌👍

    Doritos XDDoritos XD15 timer siden
  • Your questions and the way his eyes lit up. Surprised and also happy to see someone younger understanding his knowledge. Awesome

    Kevin PalmerKevin Palmer18 timer siden
  • Mr. Ottinger is SO COOL. Man, you just know he has countless other amazing stories.

    Spo8Spo821 time siden
  • The wild patricia univariably influence because belief exemplarily sigh unlike a flashy comic. aromatic, lethal lyocell

    kkcsak ndclonkkcsak ndclon22 timer siden
  • Please do a video on the X-14

    OmadaisOmadais23 timer siden
  • Back to the moon? 😅

    The Bloody TruthThe Bloody TruthDag siden
  • Comment for algorithm.

    Ciorram1Ciorram1Dag siden
  • I confess, Mr. Ottinger make me laugh a few times. What a great man

    Leandro GogolaLeandro GogolaDag siden
  • 1:45 when the impostor is sus

    Dadly25Dadly25Dag siden
  • Destin, I have a friend who has an LLTV sitting in his shed at work. I was fortunate enough to get a tour of his "work" and I can honestly say as much fun as it looks... yeah, no... His work is the same AFRC mentioned in your video. I was most impressed by the Peroxide thrusters mounted on every corner and axis of the unit. A tour of the Armstrong facility was the most incredible thing I have had the opportunity to experience. if you are ever there ask about the LLTV and perhaps they can take you to the closet for a look see. God Bless you man, I love your take on science.

    DavyBoySmithDavyBoySmithDag siden
  • We aren’t going back to the moon, not with lunchbox Joe in power.

    Egon PaxEgon PaxDag siden
  • Everybody know Apollo is a big lie

    gordonfree mangordonfree manDag siden
    • Wrong

      AtlasAtlasDag siden

    Binky CarolinaBinky CarolinaDag siden
  • @ 5:45 ---> food for thought, the Harrier Jump Jet was first tested in 1967 and introduced into service in '69... 😉

    John BravoJohn BravoDag siden
  • Why not installing a helium baloon, that lifts 5/6 of the lander's weight?

    Florian WalterFlorian WalterDag siden
  • at this point this man knows too much to be safe 🙏😂

    Super SongSuper SongDag siden
  • Where is the loud roar of the rocket when you hear them calmly talking as lunar is landing?

    Ryan RichRyan RichDag siden
    • @Atlas nms was tight

      Ryan RichRyan RichDag siden
    • It's a pressure fed engine firing in a vacuum, come on.

      AtlasAtlasDag siden
  • I would assume the lander's computer will perform the descent and landing in Artemis program.

    HirvieläinHirvieläinDag siden
  • Why do we need manual landing when we sent multiple rovers to mars and it has ability to auto land with high precision

    Suphakrit PhantharatSuphakrit PhantharatDag siden
  • 15:55 oh my ghaad

    Bogdan BogdanBogdan BogdanDag siden
  • 1:45 kinda sus....

    Bread SpreaderBread SpreaderDag siden
  • They actually planned on hitting the moon harder, the crunch pistons on the legs didn't get crunched all the way, that's why their steps are more awkward than usual, edit, because the ladder was hooked on the leg

    PatarPatarDag siden
  • Hahaha cant wait til you debunk it by looking into it :)

    Rooster OriginalRooster OriginalDag siden
    • @DrCash7 there really isn't

      AtlasAtlas7 timer siden
    • @Atlas nOtHinG to DeBuNK heRe FolKS

      DrCash7DrCash712 timer siden
    • There's nothing to debunk.

      AtlasAtlasDag siden
  • How? miniatures and a sound stage...

    britshellbritshellDag siden
  • That was fascinating! Very few people are qualified to call Neil Armstrong an idiot! lol

    mikencomikencoDag siden
  • I think what you're saying, that we need to learn about *why* decisions were made, is really the root of the "teach a man to fish" adage, and it's such a huge issue with the way I see things being taught. Don't give people the answer, give people the tools to find the answer.

    The InternetThe InternetDag siden
  • Folks at NASA are probably taking notes rn.

    Phineas GPhineas GDag siden
  • Why does the velocity have to be zero upon landing? Why not near zero?

    Black PantherBlack PantherDag siden
  • You're making it too easy for tomorrow's kids, they will look like geniuses but instead it was all on youtube.

    LavalambtronLavalambtronDag siden
    • The power of technology.

      Some OnesSome OnesDag siden
  • never went to the moon brah. hash tag moon landing hoax

    Laura WhiteLaura White2 dager siden
    • @Laura White I have better things to do than watch conspiracy videos. That said, I never came across a good hoaxer argument.

      AtlasAtlas2 dager siden
    • Atlas gee what a convincing retort Atlas. See “American Moon” on YT and then try to tell me it’s not possible that something’s up with the official narrative.

      Laura WhiteLaura White2 dager siden
    • wrong

      AtlasAtlas2 dager siden
  • You are truly a treasure! I so appreciate all of your videos, they are some of the most wholesome and informative media out there.

    David MadsenDavid Madsen2 dager siden
  • 1:58

    Ian ThorntonIan Thornton2 dager siden
  • 1:58 amongus

    AsophosAsophos2 dager siden
    • 😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳

      Some OnesSome OnesDag siden
  • 1:44 I can't take this anymore make the pain stop

    WyrylkaWyrylka2 dager siden
    • Kinda sus

      BearsBears21 time siden
  • 1:45

    Aidan GavinAidan Gavin2 dager siden
  • Thanks for the tutorial, just got invited to a Martian party. Heading out tomorrow night.

    Konnies EggKonnies Egg2 dager siden
  • Another great video. It would be interesting to know more about the rocket motor that was on the lander and got it back to the orbiter. I had read something where the NASA engineers made it as simple as possible; without any electrical connections to reduce points of failure. It was basically just a mixing of two (2) chemicals by means of the turning of two (2) mechanical valves. Thanks in advance.

    goutvols103goutvols1032 dager siden
  • I flew a test device in Grumman hangar 5 over a mosaic set of lunar photos. All I had was a mockup of the LM cockpit. I made 3 test landing attempts for evaluation data. 50 years later I toured the hangar at the Cape Canaveral facility and in an alcove next to the Saturn V rocket was the same unit I tested at the Grumman facility. I worked at Grumman for 30+ years on the A-6 Intruder , the F-14 Tomcat,and The JSTARS . Fun years!

    Carl CarterCarl Carter2 dager siden
  • There's only three ways to go to the Moon, or one. Step one, resurrect Stanley Kubrick. Step two, rent al large studio in the desert. Step three, buy all media and political influencers to give it credibility. Or Get a bunch of wicked smaht guys to get'em there.

    The Obsolete ManThe Obsolete Man2 dager siden
  • U said among us a lot

    Traci WagnonTraci Wagnon2 dager siden
  • Excellent. Great job. I know a lot more about lunar landing than I did before watching this. Sign me up!

    lungoteverelungotevere2 dager siden
  • 1:59 among us

    Tampa BlushTampa Blush2 dager siden
  • 1:45 amongus

    Tampa BlushTampa Blush2 dager siden
  • 1:45

    Jeremy HopkinsJeremy Hopkins2 dager siden
  • Boots on the moon.

    Bradyn AustinBradyn Austin2 dager siden
  • 1:45 , 1:59

    JPazerJPazer2 dager siden
  • 1:45

    JPazerJPazer2 dager siden
  • Hey, I know this video is about the moon, but I have had this question on my mind for a while now, and the recent Mars landing has brought it back again (and I can't think of anyone else to ask) so here goes... This is regarding the 7 minutes of terror: Do you think that it is possible for NASA to build signal amplifiers that would be strategically placed between Mars and Earth, and these would boost the signal enough to reduce the delay in communication time? Or is this still too far in the future? I'm thinking 2 or 3 satellites spaced evenly across the distance whose purpose is to catch and slingshot the signals back and forth... Thank you for your response (provided you get this message, or for anyone else who may have a theory/answer).

    Derrick FyffeDerrick Fyffe3 dager siden
    • The delay is because of the finite speed of light. There's nothing that can be done about that.

      AtlasAtlas2 dager siden
  • Don't you think the next lander will have highly AI assisted landing if not completely AI assisted landing? Although I agree that manual intervention from the onboard astronauts might be necessary and hence the training on earth is necessary.

    Chinmoy KatharChinmoy Kathar3 dager siden

    Travis WeideTravis Weide3 dager siden
  • What a brilliant video. Thank you.

    Peter HoarePeter Hoare3 dager siden
  • I couldnt find video of the crane attached llrv anywhere else. Where did you get the LLRF-LLRV footage, if you can/want to answer?

    Sadrho GollsodiaSadrho Gollsodia3 dager siden
  • Never heard of the X14 either - wow.

    Mac KettnerMac Kettner3 dager siden
  • Thank you for that video that was awesome I am a space not even though I am not able to go into space but that is so cool that we had that and I bet if we go back to the moon like they want us to we need that version of or a new version of training aid

    curtuswcurtusw3 dager siden
  • Thanks, dude.

    JustJoe OlesonJustJoe Oleson3 dager siden
  • 1:44 ⠀⠀⠀⡯⡯⡾⠝⠘⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢊⠘⡮⣣⠪⠢⡑⡌ ⠀⠀⠀⠟⠝⠈⠀⠀⠀⠡⠀⠠⢈⠠⢐⢠⢂⢔⣐⢄⡂⢔⠀⡁⢉⠸⢨⢑⠕⡌ ⠀⠀⡀⠁⠀⠀⠀⡀⢂⠡⠈⡔⣕⢮⣳⢯⣿⣻⣟⣯⣯⢷⣫⣆⡂⠀⠀⢐⠑⡌ ⢀⠠⠐⠈⠀⢀⢂⠢⡂⠕⡁⣝⢮⣳⢽⡽⣾⣻⣿⣯⡯⣟⣞⢾⢜⢆⠀⡀⠀⠪ ⣬⠂⠀⠀⢀⢂⢪⠨⢂⠥⣺⡪⣗⢗⣽⢽⡯⣿⣽⣷⢿⡽⡾⡽⣝⢎⠀⠀⠀⢡ ⣿⠀⠀⠀⢂⠢⢂⢥⢱⡹⣪⢞⡵⣻⡪⡯⡯⣟⡾⣿⣻⡽⣯⡻⣪⠧⠑⠀⠁⢐ ⣿⠀⠀⠀⠢⢑⠠⠑⠕⡝⡎⡗⡝⡎⣞⢽⡹⣕⢯⢻⠹⡹⢚⠝⡷⡽⡨⠀⠀⢔ ⣿⡯⠀⢈⠈⢄⠂⠂⠐⠀⠌⠠⢑⠱⡱⡱⡑⢔⠁⠀⡀⠐⠐⠐⡡⡹⣪⠀⠀⢘ ⣿⣽⠀⡀⡊⠀⠐⠨⠈⡁⠂⢈⠠⡱⡽⣷⡑⠁⠠⠑⠀⢉⢇⣤⢘⣪⢽⠀⢌⢎ ⣿⢾⠀⢌⠌⠀⡁⠢⠂⠐⡀⠀⢀⢳⢽⣽⡺⣨⢄⣑⢉⢃⢭⡲⣕⡭⣹⠠⢐⢗ ⣿⡗⠀⠢⠡⡱⡸⣔⢵⢱⢸⠈⠀⡪⣳⣳⢹⢜⡵⣱⢱⡱⣳⡹⣵⣻⢔⢅⢬⡷ ⣷⡇⡂⠡⡑⢕⢕⠕⡑⠡⢂⢊⢐⢕⡝⡮⡧⡳⣝⢴⡐⣁⠃⡫⡒⣕⢏⡮⣷⡟ ⣷⣻⣅⠑⢌⠢⠁⢐⠠⠑⡐⠐⠌⡪⠮⡫⠪⡪⡪⣺⢸⠰⠡⠠⠐⢱⠨⡪⡪⡰ ⣯⢷⣟⣇⡂⡂⡌⡀⠀⠁⡂⠅⠂⠀⡑⡄⢇⠇⢝⡨⡠⡁⢐⠠⢀⢪⡐⡜⡪⡊ ⣿⢽⡾⢹⡄⠕⡅⢇⠂⠑⣴⡬⣬⣬⣆⢮⣦⣷⣵⣷⡗⢃⢮⠱⡸⢰⢱⢸⢨⢌ ⣯⢯⣟⠸⣳⡅⠜⠔⡌⡐⠈⠻⠟⣿⢿⣿⣿⠿⡻⣃⠢⣱⡳⡱⡩⢢⠣⡃⠢⠁ ⡯⣟⣞⡇⡿⣽⡪⡘⡰⠨⢐⢀⠢⢢⢄⢤⣰⠼⡾⢕⢕⡵⣝⠎⢌⢪⠪⡘⡌⠀ ⡯⣳⠯⠚⢊⠡⡂⢂⠨⠊⠔⡑⠬⡸⣘⢬⢪⣪⡺⡼⣕⢯⢞⢕⢝⠎⢻⢼⣀⠀ ⠁⡂⠔⡁⡢⠣⢀⠢⠀⠅⠱⡐⡱⡘⡔⡕⡕⣲⡹⣎⡮⡏⡑⢜⢼⡱⢩⣗⣯⣟ ⢀⢂⢑⠀⡂⡃⠅⠊⢄⢑⠠⠑⢕⢕⢝⢮⢺⢕⢟⢮⢊⢢⢱⢄⠃⣇⣞⢞⣞⢾ ⢀⠢⡑⡀⢂⢊⠠⠁⡂⡐⠀⠅⡈⠪⠪⠪⠣⠫⠑⡁⢔⠕⣜⣜⢦⡰⡎⡯⡾⡽

    D. SkučasD. Skučas3 dager siden
    • spooky

      AtlasAtlas3 dager siden
  • Moon landings were faked, hate to break the news.

    Dick RigglesDick Riggles3 dager siden
    • Ha! You’re an ignorant moron. You know NOTHING about the engineering involved.

      Brad WooldidgeBrad Wooldidge2 dager siden
    • Hate to break it to you but you are an idiot.

      Kyle LaurentKyle Laurent3 dager siden
    • @Atlas Seriously, do some thinking and use logic...

      Dick RigglesDick Riggles3 dager siden
    • Wrong.

      AtlasAtlas3 dager siden
  • Man I'm excited for this series!

    Bastian NyströmBastian Nyström3 dager siden
  • tgagyg

    W BixW Bix3 dager siden
  • This was such an amazing technical feat that mankind accomplished. Thank you for taking the time for making this video and doing in depth research, analysis, and interviews with folks that were involved in the space program. Side note: Sad to see almost 1k flat earthers have shown up.

    Nate ShanksNate Shanks3 dager siden
  • I love getting smarter everyday with your videos

    Patrick RudolphPatrick Rudolph3 dager siden
  • 1:58

    DeltaBravoDeltaBravo3 dager siden

    TP ProductionsTP Productions3 dager siden
    • Troller alert :|

      Some OnesSome OnesDag siden
    • Troll.

      Brad WooldidgeBrad Wooldidge2 dager siden
    • fool spotted

      SkippySkippy3 dager siden
    • ****IDIOT ALERT****

      Kyle LaurentKyle Laurent3 dager siden
  • Absolutely amazing! Keep it up

    langwaydpfullangwaydpful3 dager siden
  • 13:40 *the highest resolution on a film from the 60s ever?* what i mean is that the picture is sharp enough to compare to 480dp

    torrace12torrace124 dager siden
  • It's disappointing I can't like this video more than once.

    Zach AttackZach Attack4 dager siden
  • I read Mr. Collins abridged version of his book in Reader's Digest, in a 1974 edition, when I was young, and it is a wonderful book.

    RoMadSan RodMadSanRoMadSan RodMadSan4 dager siden
  • With style

    Dab-a-tronDab-a-tron4 dager siden
  • Not thrusting...

    Zander LaMarcheZander LaMarche4 dager siden
  • Great presentation of the topic at hand again, but there where a few operational VTOL planes in the 1960 like the german EWR VJ 101 and Dornier Do 31, so not that surprised to see one on the lander program here.

    Fabian HerrmannFabian Herrmann4 dager siden
  • The apollo real time thing is really cool.

    jirikivaarijirikivaari4 dager siden
  • Another reason why people suspect it is fake is because in 1960s, there were no integrated circuits. All computation was using vacuum tubes. There is no way that they could fit that many vacuum tubes into that small module to achieve the REAL TIME SIGNAL PROCESSING FOR LIVE BROADCASTING. Once you realize it is physically impossible with 1960s technologies, you will realize the truth. Hard science won't lie.

    Jin KuangJin Kuang4 dager siden
    • @Jin Kuang Noise filtering would have been done at the ground stations. You know, the facilities with godzilla-sized satellite dishes.

      AtlasAtlas2 dager siden
    • @Kyle Laurent I know what I am talking about. This is just a small set of technical issues that are impossible to address in 1960s technologies.

      Jin KuangJin Kuang2 dager siden
    • @Atlas You have no idea what you are talking about. Noise filtering is a main operation for real time signal processing. Back in the 1960s there is a big room in TV station doing it. In fact, not until 80s do we start having broadcasting vehicles small enough to fit into a van. And that is 1980s. Think about what is in 1960s when you need to fit a life supporting system AND a broadcasting system into that landing module.

      Jin KuangJin Kuang2 dager siden
    • You have no idea what you are talking about.

      Kyle LaurentKyle Laurent3 dager siden
    • Of course there were integrated circuits back then, lol. And they didn't need to do any digital processing. It's just live TV. Live TV has been a thing since the early 1900.

      AtlasAtlas3 dager siden
  • Landing is relatively easy. Launching the heavy life support module back up to 300 miles orbit is hard, even with 1/6 gravity. That is the real reason why people suspect the US landing and returning are fake. If you have a chance to look at the return rocket combustion video, you will conclude it was a joke.

    Jin KuangJin Kuang4 dager siden
    • @Jin Kuang Just do the calculations yourself, if you really care that much. Blueprints are freely available to the public. I have no idea what you mean by 'technology data'.

      AtlasAtlas2 dager siden
    • Do you know why so much evidence were destroyed due to "negligence"? These evidence should be the most valuable technology data and blue prints for humanity. But no ... they were accidentally destroyed. Now we can not go back to the moon! Fundamental contradiction on how technology progress. How US suddenly get to land on the moon on the first try (very disruptive in technology progressing) and how suddenly it simply disappear (very disruptive in technology progressing).

      Jin KuangJin Kuang2 dager siden
    • @Atlas I have not seen one single video or documentation on the combustion fuel needed to propel this ascending module (life supporting) back to 300 miles high up in orbit. The only video I saw was that laughable shot from the "moon surface" video on the combustion capture.

      Jin KuangJin Kuang2 dager siden
    • @Jin Kuang Rocket science doesn't work like that.

      AtlasAtlas2 dager siden
    • @Atlas So it is an equivalent of 1 ton weight on earth. Shoot that up 300 miles and how much combustion material is needed?

      Jin KuangJin Kuang2 dager siden
  • 5:55 exactly, reason why america has area 51

    Antonín HájekAntonín Hájek4 dager siden
  • The yielding yacht expectantly guarantee because notebook electrophoretically borrow opposite a decorous creature. scared, damp jumbo

    Annie LogwoodAnnie Logwood4 dager siden
  • God tier science yt channel

    Andrew BickerdikeAndrew Bickerdike4 dager siden
  • 1:45 Among us 😳😳😳 nasa=among us???!!!111 among us = space game and space = nasa🚨🚨🚨😳😳😳

    AlwayslgAlwayslg4 dager siden
    • omg when amongus nasa😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳

      Some OnesSome OnesDag siden
  • I still love the space program with all my heart and this video just made me happy. Thanks Destin, for the feels, and the history lesson.

    Doug WilsonDoug Wilson4 dager siden
  • Is this useful in kerbal space program?

    Auaer AuraerAuaer Auraer4 dager siden
  • This video was amazing. I hate driving a U-Haul in my hometown because I'm not familiar with how it handles--I never thought that the very first man to go to the moon had to confront the most extreme version of that feeling.

    CultureStressCultureStress4 dager siden
  • 1:45 😮

    Ethan BacarellaEthan Bacarella4 dager siden
  • 1:45 😳😳

    Shallow SportsmenShallow Sportsmen4 dager siden
  • Beautiful

    Paul AndersonPaul Anderson4 dager siden
  • Ottinger "I take some responsibility for not imagining that he could have been so dumb" first of all, lol, and second of all, I've had many of those moments in my career. I don't say that to make myself feel superior to anyone else but anticipating things that might go wrong, especially when it involves other people, is a serious challenge.

    Jon MooreJon Moore4 dager siden
  • The hurt badge pivotally concentrate because monkey temporarily invent given a mysterious kiss. black-and-white, brave insulation

    Mora MulfordMora Mulford4 dager siden
  • How to land on the moon? The same way you land on cheddar. Boo-yah!

    Peter PikePeter Pike4 dager siden
  • Have you made a video about Vortex Ring State vs “Settling With Power” in helicopters and the seeming controversy about the two terms between the US definitions and international definitions? The helicopter that crashed during the Bin Laden raid sent me down that rabbit hole. It’s interesting and difficult to find specifics. Would be interesting I think.

    Skywalker SoundSkywalker Sound4 dager siden